<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remote Differential Compression And Your Vista Network Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/</link>
	<description>Helping you get the most out of Vista</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:01:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>This is a nonsense test.

RDC is for syncronizing altered files over slow networks.

You should have put your 4gig file on a remote server over ADSL or dial-up, then changed some stuff inside it, then used RDC to sync the files.

You would then have discovered RDC is about 135937500 seconds faster than re-uploading the entire 4gigs a second time to the remote server...  (assuming a regular ADSL1 connection)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a nonsense test.</p>
<p>RDC is for syncronizing altered files over slow networks.</p>
<p>You should have put your 4gig file on a remote server over ADSL or dial-up, then changed some stuff inside it, then used RDC to sync the files.</p>
<p>You would then have discovered RDC is about 135937500 seconds faster than re-uploading the entire 4gigs a second time to the remote server&#8230;  (assuming a regular ADSL1 connection)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7463</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-7463</guid>
		<description>@ Haisen, We weren&#039;t having problems with the file copy process not responding and hanging, the issue was slow transferring speeds which has been solved. 
Service Pack 1 fixed a lot of problems in Vista and now that SP2 is available I recommend everyone install that too. 

Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Haisen, We weren&#8217;t having problems with the file copy process not responding and hanging, the issue was slow transferring speeds which has been solved.<br />
Service Pack 1 fixed a lot of problems in Vista and now that SP2 is available I recommend everyone install that too. </p>
<p>Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haisen</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7462</link>
		<dc:creator>Haisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-7462</guid>
		<description>Cut the craB.You just need ONE hottfix to solve that peformance problem of yours.You do not need to instal a whole package of junk(with a lot of data that will not serve you ,and will impair your system) from the vista service pack 1*.


HERE&#039;S THE LINK FOR THE HOTFIX:

Windows6.0-KB931770-x86

Link for 32 bit only

(1)http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931770

(2)http://thehotfixshare.net/board/index.php?autocom=downloads
showfile=83

*You can instead select the hotfixes you want instaled on your system vista service pack 1.When you download SP1 on Windows Update you can select what packs you want to download.Do it.Pick up the packs codes and search their fuction on Google.

http://thehotfixshare.net/board/index.php?showtopic=3170 (about)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut the craB.You just need ONE hottfix to solve that peformance problem of yours.You do not need to instal a whole package of junk(with a lot of data that will not serve you ,and will impair your system) from the vista service pack 1*.</p>
<p>HERE&#8217;S THE LINK FOR THE HOTFIX:</p>
<p>Windows6.0-KB931770-x86</p>
<p>Link for 32 bit only</p>
<p>(1)http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931770</p>
<p>(2)http://thehotfixshare.net/board/index.php?autocom=downloads<br />
showfile=83</p>
<p>*You can instead select the hotfixes you want instaled on your system vista service pack 1.When you download SP1 on Windows Update you can select what packs you want to download.Do it.Pick up the packs codes and search their fuction on Google.</p>
<p><a href="http://thehotfixshare.net/board/index.php?showtopic=3170" rel="nofollow">http://thehotfixshare.net/board/index.php?showtopic=3170</a> (about)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copy and Move Paralysis &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6382</link>
		<dc:creator>Copy and Move Paralysis &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-6382</guid>
		<description>[...] you might try disabling RDC and see if it helps. Here&#039;s some stuff about RDC and file copy times:  http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/1...etwork-part-2/  Control Panel&#124;Programs and Features&#124;Turn Windows Features on or off&#124;uncheck Remote Differential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you might try disabling RDC and see if it helps. Here&#8217;s some stuff about RDC and file copy times:  <a href="http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/1...etwork-part-2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/1&#8230;etwork-part-2/</a>  Control Panel|Programs and Features|Turn Windows Features on or off|uncheck Remote Differential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Amitai</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Amitai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>The link above, http://http//www.vistarevisited.com/2008/05/24/how-to-improve-network-performance-in-windows-vista/ , appears to be dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link above, <a href="http://http//www.vistarevisited.com/2008/05/24/how-to-improve-network-performance-in-windows-vista/" rel="nofollow">http://http//www.vistarevisited.com/2008/05/24/how-to-improve-network-performance-in-windows-vista/</a> , appears to be dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Improve Network Performance in Windows Vista &#124; Vista Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1458</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Improve Network Performance in Windows Vista &#124; Vista Revisited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 22:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-1458</guid>
		<description>[...] a reader named Tarrant1701 posted a comment in my follow-up post about RDC asking about his slow networking speeds on his gigabit network and we got into a Email discussion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a reader named Tarrant1701 posted a comment in my follow-up post about RDC asking about his slow networking speeds on his gigabit network and we got into a Email discussion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>@ Tarrant,
Sorry I took so long to get back to you I was working out of town this week. I feel your pain with the slow network transfers. I&#039;m just on a regular 100mb switch so you can imagine how slow my network is. Have you tried disabling auto tuning yet, I did get a modest speed increase when i disabled it. Follow this link and let me know if it helps. http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/11/26/disable-vistas-autotuning-to-improve-wireless-connectivity/

Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tarrant,<br />
Sorry I took so long to get back to you I was working out of town this week. I feel your pain with the slow network transfers. I&#8217;m just on a regular 100mb switch so you can imagine how slow my network is. Have you tried disabling auto tuning yet, I did get a modest speed increase when i disabled it. Follow this link and let me know if it helps. <a href="http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/11/26/disable-vistas-autotuning-to-improve-wireless-connectivity/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/11/26/disable-vistas-autotuning-to-improve-wireless-connectivity/</a></p>
<p>Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarrant</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>I backed up my HTPC running MCE 2005 dvr-ms files across my Gigabit LAN to a WinXP Pro SP2 computer. Both computers used a Gigabit NIC with standard frames across a Gigabit switch. I got a transfer rate of 30 MBytes/sec (= 240 Mbits/sec).

I then did a clean install of Vista Ultimate on my HTPC, installed SP1, turned off IPv6 and kept RDC on. Restored my dvr-ms back to the HTPC, and now the transfer rate was only 11 MBytes/sec (88 Mbits/sec). Turned RDC off and essentially still got 11 MBytes/sec. Tried copying a file instead from the HTPC to my XP comp, still got the same transfer rate.

Why I am still getting crappy XP  Vista transfer rates across a Gigabit LAN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I backed up my HTPC running MCE 2005 dvr-ms files across my Gigabit LAN to a WinXP Pro SP2 computer. Both computers used a Gigabit NIC with standard frames across a Gigabit switch. I got a transfer rate of 30 MBytes/sec (= 240 Mbits/sec).</p>
<p>I then did a clean install of Vista Ultimate on my HTPC, installed SP1, turned off IPv6 and kept RDC on. Restored my dvr-ms back to the HTPC, and now the transfer rate was only 11 MBytes/sec (88 Mbits/sec). Turned RDC off and essentially still got 11 MBytes/sec. Tried copying a file instead from the HTPC to my XP comp, still got the same transfer rate.</p>
<p>Why I am still getting crappy XP  Vista transfer rates across a Gigabit LAN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>@ Matt MS, That a good idea. I was planning on waiting for the final version of SP1 then redoing the test. Thanks for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Matt MS, That a good idea. I was planning on waiting for the final version of SP1 then redoing the test. Thanks for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt MS</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-689</guid>
		<description>As I understand it the differential compression is most useful with syncing whole folders and when internal sections of files are updated.  The diff-comp can sync bits and pieces as opposed to the whole file.

It would be interesting to re-do your test and just change a couple bytes in the GIG file...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it the differential compression is most useful with syncing whole folders and when internal sections of files are updated.  The diff-comp can sync bits and pieces as opposed to the whole file.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to re-do your test and just change a couple bytes in the GIG file&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vista Revisited - &#187; Remote Differential Compression And Your Vista Network</title>
		<link>http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista Revisited - &#187; Remote Differential Compression And Your Vista Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistarevisited.com/2007/10/20/remote-differential-compression-and-your-vista-network-part-2/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] Remote Differential Compression And Your Vista Network Part 2  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remote Differential Compression And Your Vista Network Part 2  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
